Sunday 28 April 2013

Post-crit: A Brief History of Postmodern Cinema


Presentation for first crit














After our first crit, I received some very helpful feedback about how to keep in touch with the theme. Previously I had a separate idea of using text as background and overlaying it with key points, but I hadn't thought about putting this and the current layout plan together.
Fred made the point that I don't need as much text at the forefront of the spreads, as I was doing a lot of writing about the background and since I was aiming this publication at people who have an existing interest in the films/theme, they probably already know this information.
This allowed me to prioritise some other aspects of the film, a strictly postmodern analysis, the significance behind some quotes and the controversy caused by some of the themes or characters. I put the background information I had already written as the background text and made it pt. 6 Helvetica Light, deliberately small and unreadable to help the reader realise that the background text is not important, and not necessary to read.
To aid this concept further I avoided paragraphs or any way of breaking up the text, making it deliberately difficult to decipher.





There were some quotes from reviews and the film itself that I planned on laying over the top of the text but to do that I had to ensure that the text was of an appropriate weight and size to be much more readable than the background. Similarly, obstructing some of the background text implies that it doesn't need to be read (and in some cases can't). I chose to do this and to have some body of text just talking about key features and points in the film, but when doing this body copy I had to use some of the coloured sections behind the text to separate it from the background, as I can't have the text as heavy and large as with the quotes etc.




After completing the content I turned my attention to binding. I really wanted the content to be reflected in the style of the book and the nature of the binding. I did some research into slightly more innovative binding options.




This is a pretty interesting cover and binding method, given that the content of this book is based on woodwork. While I would love to try something like this sometime, I could see it taking up a lot of time that I would rather spend perfecting the content. In spite of the complexity of using wood, the binding is very simple and seems a bit too modern for my publication.



The intricacy of this string binding makes the book look delicate in spite of the hard back, and it is something I would like to experiment with, however, I want my publication to be more abrupt and forceful, so this style may not lend itself to my theme.



A basic perfect bound hard back would lend itself to my theme, it's quite demanding when partnered with the luminous yellow.




Had I chosen to make something in a leaflet or brochure, this would work extremely well and would allow me to create some sort of cryptic message within the production as well as the content.



While this isn't a theme that I would use for my own book, it has embodied the theme in every manner, even such details as the rolling papers for pages and the match lighting spine.

I chose to perfect bind my publication with a hardback, leaving the images and content to do the work. I didn't want the binding to distract the attention that I hoped the book would deserve. However, after considering the theme, I thought about changing it to a zine, making it much more casual, and in the end I tried to find a medium by still perfect binding the book but just with a paperback.
At the point at which I had made my binding decisions, I no longer had time to bind the book myself and so sent it to Hobs Reprographics for a paper back perfect bound version.

Sunday 14 April 2013

A Brief History Of Postmodern Cinema Development

I wanted to embody the theme of the films in my publication, incorporating quite a fragmented structure. I tried deliberately to avoid much of a structural layout and so boycotted the use of grids and experimented with a random structure when developing.




After coming up with some initial ideas I experimented with a selection of them, putting them into practice on Indesign. The first I tried was an idea in which I wanted one image to feature heavily, perhaps breaking it apart into sections.





I varied the layout on each of the pages in order to avoid sticking to some sort of system. However, by using only one image per page, no matter how much it is broken up, a lot of the responsibility falls on the text to make the layout appear postmodern.

Before filling the text I tried to break up the page more, using sections of orange, grey and black (colours used frequently in Tarantino films, namely Pulp Fiction). Similarly I took this into account when choosing the typeface for the directors names, I chose Headline One which in my opinion is equally as demanding as it is simple and it's not too overwhelming, although this may be something I will change as the aim is for it to be quite overwhelming.



When I put in the text, I found that  it still wasn't enough to make it as overtly postmodern as the films I am discussing are. In spite of this the colour scheme worked really well so I decided to experiment further with the layout and keep reworking it.

For a second version I incorporated a film reel in which I could place images of some key moments in the film, and this would fill up a lot of the page with images.





When this layout varies it keeps the book interesting while keeping in touch with the theme of the films and the aim for the publication.

Wednesday 3 April 2013

Postmodern Cinema Content Research

For my research into postmodern cinema I tried to keep postmodern themes in the lead of the content and so used analysis of the films I chose to familiarise myself with what I needed to put before other parts of the book.
To gain some control over my content I started by finding correlations between analysis and reviews of different films, to find common ground it all of them, helping me prioritise what makes them what they are, and where I can place the focal points.


http://sensesofcinema.com/2003/great-directors/coens/


http://voices.yahoo.com/fargo-analysis-coen-brothers-movie-562080.html?cat=40






http://ghettothinker.wordpress.com/2011/01/12/pulp-fiction-film-analysis/



http://www.angelfire.com/movies/oc/reservoir.html

For film reviews I mostly looked at those on TimeOut and Empire. These magazines/websites are aimed specifically at film buffs and people interested in film. This is same target audience my publication was aimed at. I plan to be able to talk about twists and plots openly with the reader, so they will need to be someone who has seen the films, is interested in the films/theme and who understands the terminology and critique.





For more fact based information I used imdb.com for the information on actors, producers etc. It is an easy website to follow and the information on it is extremely reliable.